Situational Awareness Assessment

You operate in a regulated environment.
Do you know its exposure?

The diagnostic entry point to Calyx Intelligence. A scoped assessment for regulated SMBs, mid-market firms, and accounting practices serving regulated clients — mapping traditional regulatory exposure and AI governance exposure in a single engagement.

01 Architecture validated in production — ongoing engagement at regulated accounting firm with documented turnaround outcomes
Scoped engagement
Two chapters
Vendor-agnostic
Written findings memo
Entry to Calyx infrastructure
Who This Is For

If you operate in a regulated environment — legal, financial services, healthcare, insurance, accounting — your exposure is structural, not optional. The reviewing parties don't decide whether to scrutinize you. They decide when.

You don't need to have done anything wrong for a review to be painful. You just need to be unprepared. Most operators are.

The SAA is designed for the operator who has been focused on running the business — not organizing it for scrutiny, and not tracking where AI has entered the workflow without governance. It is the diagnostic entry point to Calyx Intelligence: a scoped engagement that surfaces where you stand, ranked by what to fix first, and connected to architectural remediation when the findings call for it.

Accounting practices serving regulated clientsIf your firm advises clients in legal, financial services, healthcare, or regulated industries, your exposure is shaped by theirs. Documentation gaps and AI usage patterns compound across the practice.
Multi-entity structures with intercompany activityIf you operate across more than one entity and funds, services, or decisions move between them, you need clean documentation of why, when, and under what authority.
Mid-market firms in regulated verticalsLegal practices, financial advisors, insurance brokerages, healthcare operations — the regulatory surface is structural, and the AI surface is growing inside the workflow whether you've mapped it or not.
Partners, investors, or shareholdersShared ownership means scrutiny of how money moved, how decisions were made, and who authorized what. Internal records must hold up under external review.
Insurance policies with claims history or upcoming renewalsCoverage disputes, claim investigations, and premium audits require documentation of operations, incidents, AI usage, and compliance posture. Gaps become denials.
Employees using AI tools day-to-dayChatGPT, Claude, AI copilots embedded in accounting, CRM, or customer service software — if your people are using it, your business is already exposed to decisions you haven't governed. Insurers and regulators are starting to ask.
Any operator who hasn't conducted an internal review recentlyIf you've been growing, changing, or just running — and no one has looked at the full picture in the last 12–18 months — the regulatory environment has moved while you weren't watching.
What Can Trigger a Review

Six vectors.
One assessment.

Any one of these can generate a documentation request on short notice. The SAA prepares you for all of them — because you rarely get to choose which one shows up first.

🏛️
IRS & Tax Authorities
AI-driven flagging is live and expanding. Return consistency, payroll deposit tie-outs, K-1 mismatches, and lifestyle-to-income ratios are all being cross-referenced automatically.
Common triggerInconsistent positions across forms, weak documentation, anomalous patterns flagged algorithmically
🏦
Banks & Lenders
Floor plan audits, covenant compliance reviews, credit line renewals, and SBA loan examinations all require financial records that match — across entities, across periods, across representations made at origination.
Common triggerCovenant breach, renewal cycle, floor plan audit, or credit review request
🛡️
Insurance Companies
Coverage disputes, claims investigations, and policy audits require documentation of operations, incidents, compliance posture, and business structure. Gaps become denials. Denials become disputes.
Common triggerClaim filing, policy renewal, coverage dispute, or premium audit
⚖️
Litigation & Discovery
Opposing counsel's first move is document requests. If your books are messy, entities are commingled, and records can't be produced cleanly — your own financial disorganization becomes a weapon used against you.
Common triggerAny lawsuit involving the business, a partner, or a transaction
🔍
Internal Controls & Entity Integrity
Commingled funds, unauthorized transfers, missing approvals, and undocumented intercompany transactions don't just create legal exposure — they erode the defensibility of every other record you have.
Common triggerPartner dispute, ownership change, succession planning, or investor due diligence
🧠
AI Governance & Data Exposure
Your people are already using AI tools — often without your knowledge. Customer data is flowing into ChatGPT. AI is drafting client communications. Embedded AI in your software is influencing decisions. If something goes wrong, you need to be able to reconstruct what happened. Most businesses cannot.
Common triggerData breach, customer complaint, insurance claim involving AI-assisted decision, or regulatory inquiry about AI use
Scope of Review

Two chapters.
One unified assessment.

Your business has exposure in two directions — from the regulatory world that already exists, and from the AI world that is arriving whether you're ready or not. The SAA reviews both in a single engagement, because the organizations reviewing you won't look at them in isolation either.

Chapter 1 — Compliance Readiness

What your existing records actually say about your business.

The foundational review. Where your structure, your books, and your filings would hold up — or break down — under scrutiny from any of the traditional review sources.

01
Entity Structure & Separation
Are your entities properly separated in practice, not just on paper? We review how funds move between entities, whether intercompany transactions are documented, and whether the corporate veil is intact.
02
Financial Records & P&L Integrity
Do your books match your returns, your bank statements, and your representations to lenders or partners? We look for inconsistencies across periods and across sources that create exposure.
03
Commingling & Account Controls
Business and personal funds that have touched, mixed, or been used interchangeably create risk in every direction. We identify where commingling exists and what it would look like to an outside reviewer.
04
Authorization & Approval Gaps
Who authorized what, when, and under what authority? Missing approvals, undocumented decisions, and informal arrangements that never made it into writing are common exposure points.
05
Documentation & Filing Consistency
If a request came in tomorrow, could you produce clean, organized records on a reasonable timeline? And do your tax positions, financial statements, loan applications, and internal records all tell the same story? Inconsistency across documents — even unintentional — creates significant risk under any type of review.
Chapter 2 — AI Exposure Mapping

What your AI tools are doing — whether you know it or not.

The new threat vector. Most businesses have already adopted AI tools at the employee level without realizing it, and have no visibility into what data is flowing, what decisions are being shaped, or what they'd need to reconstruct if something went wrong.

01
AI Tool Inventory
Which AI tools are your people actually using? ChatGPT, Claude, Copilots, embedded AI in your CRM, accounting software, marketing platform, customer service tool. Most ownership has no idea how many AI systems are already operating inside their business.
02
Data Flow & Customer Information Exposure
What customer data, financial information, or proprietary material is flowing into AI systems? Is it being retained for training? Who owns what's generated? Most AI terms of service read very differently than people assume.
03
AI-Influenced Decisions & Customer-Facing Output
Where are AI tools shaping decisions that touch customers, counterparties, or regulated activities? Drafting communications, triaging service requests, generating proposals, setting pricing. If a customer disputes an outcome, can you explain how it was generated?
04
Shadow AI & Employee Adoption
Employees regularly adopt AI tools without telling management. Personal accounts used for work tasks, paid subscriptions on company cards that HR doesn't know about, free tiers with data retention policies that don't meet your obligations. We surface what's actually in use.
05
Provenance & Reconstructability
If a regulator, insurer, or opposing counsel asked you to reconstruct a specific AI-assisted decision from 90 days ago — including what was asked, what model was used, what it produced, and who approved it — could you? Most businesses cannot. This is the gap regulators are now looking for.
Further Reading

Why the AI half of this matters — right now.

The second chapter of the SAA exists because human scrutiny relaxes as AI reliability appears to increase. Workflow discipline alone doesn't survive scale. The Calyx Insights hub collects the analyses behind that argument — regulatory environment, enforcement trends, architectural posture.

Calyx Insights
The full Calyx Intelligence insights hub.
Analyses on AI governance, regulatory environment, enforcement trends, and the architectural posture that connects them. Updated continuously.
What You Get

Clear findings.
Ranked priorities.
Actionable steps.

Not a compliance checklist. Not a generic risk matrix. A specific, written assessment of your situation — what we found across both chapters, what it means, and what to fix first.

01
Dual Exposure Map
A structured overview of where your business has documentation gaps, control weaknesses, or inconsistencies — across both compliance readiness (Chapter 1) and AI exposure (Chapter 2). Specific to your entities, your structure, your records, and your tools.
02
Priority Gap List
The 3–7 specific issues that represent your most immediate exposure — ranked by severity and by how likely they are to surface under each type of review. What to fix first, in order.
03
Written Findings Memo
A clean, structured memo summarizing what we found and what it means. Clear enough to act on immediately. Detailed enough to hand to your attorney, CPA, or lender if questions arise.
04
Remediation Priorities
Specific steps — not generic recommendations. What documents to create, what accounts to separate, what AI tools to govern or replace, what approvals to formalize, what positions to reconcile. Ranked by urgency.
05
Follow-On Consultation
A focused call to walk through findings, answer questions, and confirm next steps. You leave the engagement knowing exactly where you stand — and what it would take to get clean.
06
Referral Coordination
Where findings require action from your CPA, attorney, or lender, we help frame the conversation — so they understand what we found and can act on it without starting from scratch.
What the Assessment Unlocks

Findings that are executable.

Most assessments produce a report that goes in a drawer. The SAA produces findings that map directly to governance infrastructure that already exists. Every priority gap on the deliverable connects to a specific architectural remediation path through Calyx Intelligence — not a generic recommendation, not a referral to a different vendor.

01
Assessment surfaces the gaps
Two chapters, written findings memo, ranked priorities. You see exactly where you stand — and what the most consequential exposure is.
02
Practitioner engagement delivers the remediation
For firms where findings call for ongoing work rather than a one-time fix, the next step is a Fractional Chief AI Officer engagement. Practitioner-led, with Calyx Intelligence as the infrastructure layer underneath. Vertical engines — Juris for legal and procedural exposure, Numera for financial and tax exposure, and corresponding engines for insurance and healthcare — are deployed under the same governance spine.
03
Governance infrastructure keeps them closed
LedgerGuard provenance, execution-time authority binding, audit-defensible decision evidence. Not a one-time fix. A standing operating architecture that survives external review by design.
The assessment stands alone if that's all you need. When findings call for ongoing work, the next step is a Fractional CAIO engagement — practitioner-led, infrastructure-backed, scoped to regulated firms where AI is moving from pilot to production and the governance question is now structural.
How It Works

Four steps.
No retainer. No ongoing commitment.

01
Intake Conversation
We start with a call to understand your business structure, entity setup, AI tool usage, and the specific areas of concern. Scope and investment confirmed after this call.
30–45 min
02
Document & Records Review
You share key financial records, returns, entity documents, AI tool inventory, and anything relevant to the compliance and AI areas we're reviewing. We assess against the six threat vectors and documentation standards.
3–5 days
03
Analysis & Findings Build
We build your dual exposure map across both chapters, identify priority gaps, draft the written findings memo, and map each priority to specific Calyx architectural remediation paths.
5–7 days
04
Delivery & Consultation Call
Written memo delivered. Follow-on call to walk through every finding, answer questions, and confirm exactly what to do next and in what order.
2–3 days
Get Started

Request Your Situational
Awareness Assessment

Tell us a bit about your situation. We'll respond within one business day.

Scope
Scoped engagement, two chapters
Compliance readiness plus AI exposure mapping. No retainer.
Investment
Scoped per engagement
Pricing reflects entity complexity and review depth. Confirmed after the intake call.
Timeline
2–3 weeks
From intake call to written findings memo and follow-on consultation.
Deliverable
Written findings memo
Dual exposure map, priority gap list, and follow-on consultation.

✓ Received. We will respond within one business day.
Something went wrong. Please email us directly at info@calyxos.ai